Comments to the Reviewers
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سالهای 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کاملList of Reviewers of IJRR issues 2015 - ACKNOWLEGMENT
Many scientists and colleagues from abroad and inside Iran (listed below) voluntarily helped us very much in review and evaluation process of manuscripts being accepted for publication in 2015 issues of IJRR (volume 13, numbers 1-4) and those not suitable for publication. Indeed their careful and critically reading the manuscripts and their valuable comments and suggestions greatly improved the...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “Molecular analysis of the microbial community structures in water-flooding petroleum reservoirs with different temperatures”
Dear Dr. Kirsten Küsel, We would like to thank you and the reviewers for your time and efforts to review our manuscript. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. The two reviewer’s comments were considered carefully and we have addressed the issues raised accordingly. Detailed answers to the reviewers’ comments are given below in the section Authors’ Responses to...
متن کاملComments Received from Peer Reviewers on the NIOSH draft Document “Asbestos and Other Mineral Fibers: A Roadmap for Scientific Research” The comments received from the peer reviewers of the draft NIOSH document “Asbestos and Other Mineral Fibers: A Roadmap
The comments received from the peer reviewers of the draft NIOSH document “Asbestos and Other Mineral Fibers: A Roadmap for Scientific Research” are compiled below. The peer reviewers were asked to respond to 14 questions. Their general comments on the document are presented first, and their responses to each question follow in no particular order of author. To move to the comments on a specifi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014